Wednesday, April 30, 2014

The BScubed/Patently Absurd Award goes to...

Montgomery County, MD for trying to sell the public the severely flawed, unsafe, supposed-to-be-brand-new, lemon, Silver Spring Transit Center.

If someone(s) tried to sell you this car,


would you buy it?

Of course not!

... but, that's what Montgomery County MD wants you to do with the severely flawed, unsafe, supposed-to-be-brand-new, lemon, Silver Spring Transit Center.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/md-politics/transit-center-report-public-at-risk-from-falling-concrete-without-additional-repairs/2014/04/29/90bdf8a2-cfca-11e3-a6b1-45c4dffb85a6_story.html

"The public will be at increased risk from falling chunks of concrete...

... But Augustine’s report strikes a markedly different tone, calling the problem “a structural integrity issue as well as a potential local safety issue for the general public.”

... falling concrete could pose a danger to some of the estimated 30,000 commuters who are expected to use the bus-and-train hub each day.

“Any dislodged pieces of concrete could pose a potential safety hazard to pedestrians walking below an area where [falling concrete] occurs,” the report says.

“... we do see a safety issue...” 

Metro, which is supposed to take possession of the center and operate it when repairs have been completed ... has shared Parsons Brinckerhoff’s concern about possible damage from the reinforcement work. 

Leggett said Tuesday that he’d reviewed the report but that ultimately it was up to Metro, as the county’s “customer,” to decide what to do. He said he was prepared to pursue one of two options.

If Metro decides the beam and girder issues are not urgent, the county will complete the remaining scheduled work this spring. That involves placing a new layer of latex-modified concrete on all three levels of the center to address cracks. Under that scenario, the county would turn the building over to Metro this summer for a possible early-fall opening.

The county is negotiating a surety bond — a form of binding financial assurance — from Parsons Brinckerhoff to guarantee that it will pay for any shear and torsion issues that might arise in the future.

The other option is for Metro to decide to go ahead with beam and girder reinforcement prior to opening the facility. That would push the opening into late 2014 and possibly early 2015.

“I’m prepared to go forward. We’ll do whatever they want,” Leggett said.

Council member Roger Berliner (D-Potomac-Bethesda), chairman of the council’s transportation and environment committee, said it is time for Metro to make a decision.

“I think we’re at a fork in the road,” he said. “It is time for them to tell us which of these two paths to go,” he said.


There you have it! It's Metro's decision. 

In essence, Montgomery County is saying to the public (like Mr. Goodwrench): "You (the public) can pay me now, or you can pay me later. Either way (whatever Metro decides) you're going to buy a severely flawed, clearly defective, lemon. And, by the way, the 'rigourous safety inspection program', that Augustine says will be necessary in the future to prevent chunks of concrete from falling on your (the public's) heads, is going to cost you (the public) a ton."

Such a deal!  

Not only does the public get a severely flawed, clearly defective, supposed-to-be-brand-new, lemon, transit center; but also, we (the public) get, at our (the public's) expense, an expensive future "rigourous safety inspection program" (that goes with this supposed-to-be-brand-new lemon) that is needed to keep chunks of concrete from falling on our (the public's) heads in the future. ... Oh! And, by the way, this fabulous deal isn't Montgomery County's decision; it's Metro's.


It was a tough decision here at BScubed deciding whether to award Montgomery County the BScubed/Patently Absurd Award or the BScubed/Brass Balls Award. It was a close vote. 

Congratulations, Montgomery County, the BScubed/Patently Absurd Award is yours.


Saturday, April 19, 2014

The Prestigious Platinum Pinocchio award goes to...

“The Silver Spring Transit Center Masters of Deceit”: Montgomery County officials, staff, consultants and others who have been making public statements about the status of the Silver Spring Transit Center and the news media for spreading the deceit by failing to investigate this story “in-depth” and to ask “probing questions”.

Listen carefully to this tape: http://www.mymcmedia.org/valerie-ervin-on-silver-spring-transit-center-video/ 
(Valerie Ervin is a former Montgomery County councilwoman who resigned her seat in December 2013.)
Pay close attention to the “code phrases”.

“...a lot of the story is still underneath the surface...”
Translated: We haven’t been told the whole truth.

“I think it was a mistake for the County Executive to say that it will not cost taxpayers another dime...it's going to cost taxpayers a LOT of money until it is resolved”
Translated: Telling taxpayers that it isn’t going to cost them another dime is deceitful.

“...people have many reasons not to believe what they've been told..."
Translated: We’ve been lied to.

Congratulations, Montgomery County executive, council, staff, consultants and others, including the news media. The Prestigious Platinum Pinocchio award is yours.








Tuesday, April 15, 2014

SURPRISE!!!

http://www.mymcmedia.org/valerie-ervin-on-silver-spring-transit-center-video/

Listen to the video. This isn't what we've been hearing from Montgomery County and the news media (print, TV, radio, internet) for the past year since the serious flaws to the Silver Spring Transit Center were made public. 




Thank you, Ms. Ervin, for telling us the truth, something that Montgomery County hasn't been telling us, and that the news media hasn't been spreading (the truth).

"...questions...cost to taxpayers?...when will it be delivered?...is it safe?...who's to blame?...a lot of the story is still underneath the surface...a mistake for the County Executive to say that it will not cost taxpayers another dime...it's going to cost taxpayers a LOT of money until it is resolved...it's yet to be determined if WMATA will accept the building...people have many reasons not to believe what they've been told..."

I'm glad that you think that the building is safe, Ms. Ervin. I hope that you're right. Are you a licensed engineer? Do you have an engineering degree?


Those waiting for Montgomery County to voluntarily tell them the whole truth about the Silver Spring Transit Center have a long wait. The same goes for those waiting for the news media to uncover the whole truth. I agree, Ms. Ervin, it's not going to happen any time soon. If the whole truth ever does come out, it's going to have to be dragged out. It'll take lots of work. The whole truth about the Silver Spring Transit Center won't come out easily. Obviously, the news media isn't up to the challenge (where are Woodward & Bernstein when you need them?).




Wednesday, April 9, 2014

the BScubed/Goofy award goes to...

David Dise, Director of Montgomery County MD's Department of General Services. 

Mr. Dise, who has previously received BScubed awards for Baseless Self Serving Statements such as "The SSTC will absolutely be safe" and "We don't do well with unusual projects" and "We focus on delivering a first-class product in all the projects that we construct", has come up with the goofiest Baseless Self Serving Statement of them all:

"This structure's already survived an earthquake."

http://www.wtop.com/46/3599110/No-firm-date-on-troubled-Silver-Spring-Transit-Center
  • The yet-to-be-opened Silver Spring Transit Center hasn't seen its first car, much less its first fully loaded bus. Mr. Dise's latest Baseless Self Serving Statement is like declaring a new ship seaworthy before it leaves drydock.
  • All but a miniscule number of structures have survived earthquakes in the eastern US.
Mr. Dise, how about waiting until "independent engineering and construction experts", who don't consider the SSTC to be "unusual", declare it safe, and fully loaded buses start rolling across its cracked and thinner-than-they're-supposed-to-be decks, before you declare the SSTC safe (albeit "unusual")?

Congratulations, Mr. Dise, for the goofiest Baseless Self Serving Statement ever.



Saturday, April 5, 2014

Montgomery Co. throws WMATA under the bus again

Look out, WMATA! Montgomery County is trying to throw you under the bus again! (Excuse the pun.)

In July of last year Roger Berliner, Montgomery County MD councilman, tried to throw WMATA under the bus by saying: “The notion that you (WMATA) have no less responsibility than our county does with respect to the current state of affairs is something where we would need to understand how you could take that posture." 

http://www.wjla.com/articles/2013/07/montgomery-county-wmata-fight-over-silver-spring-transit-center--91762.html

Mr. Berliner's Baseless Self Serving Statement (BSSS or BScubed) is absurd, of course, because the Silver Spring Transit Center is Montgomery County's project, and it's Montgomery County's responsibility to inspect and approve all construction in Montgomery County. 

Now, Montgomery County is trying to throw WMATA under the bus again. 

"The county builds projects such as libraries, police and fire stations, and recreation centers very well, but it tends to run into trouble when it tries to address unusual projects in the usual ways, said David Dise, director of the county’s Department of General Services." 

http://www.gazette.net/article/20140404/NEWS/140409374/1022/montgomery-looking-at-ways-to-avoid-cost-overruns&template=gazette

"...unusual project..." 

It's your fault, WMATA. 


On a serious note, it doesn't say much for Montgomery County for them to admit that they are incapable of handling "unusual" projects. It just raises more questions that the news media (print, TV, radio, internet) won't ask:

  • If Montgomery County can't handle "unusual" projects, then why did Montgomery County take on the SSTC, at taxpayer expense, in the first place? 
  • Why did Montgomery County take on construction management for the SSTC, assigning a team of full time County employees to it? 
  • How does Montgomery County define an "unusual" project? Is a skyscraper an "unusual" project? Silver Spring, Bethesda, Chevy Chase, Rockville, etc. have plenty of skyscrapers. I wouldn't want to be working or living in one of them knowing that Montgomery County can't handle construction inspection for "unusual" projects.
Among other concerns, taxpayers should be concerned that millions in public funds (local, state, federal) have been wasted because Montgomery County can't handle construction management and construction inspection for "unusual" projects.

And, on a final note, the same guy who is saying that Montgomery County can't do "unusual" projects is widely quoted as saying "The SSTC will absolutely be safe."  

  • Are you ready to "take to the bank" his Baseless Self Serving Statement (BSSS or BScubed) that "the SSTC will absolutely be safe" knowing that Montgomery County can't handle "unusual" projects?
You can't have it both ways, Montgomery County. If the SSTC is so "unusual" that it's beyond your expertise, then you shouldn't be making Baseless Self Serving Statements like "the SSTC will absolutely be safe".


Tuesday, April 1, 2014

It wouldn't be the first time in MD

"On October 10, 1973, Spiro Agnew became the second Vice President to resign the office. ...  Agnew resigned and then pleaded no contest to criminal charges of tax evasion,[25] part of a negotiated resolution to a scheme wherein he was accused of accepting more than $100,000 in bribes[26] during his tenure as governor of Maryland. Agnew was fined $10,000 and put on three years' probation.[27] The $10,000 fine covered only the taxes and interest due on what was "unreported income" from 1967. The plea bargain was later mocked by former Maryland attorney general Stephen H. Sachs as "the greatest deal since the Lord spared Isaac on the mountaintop."[28] Students of Professor John F. Banzhaf III from the George Washington University Law School, collectively known as Banzhaf's Bandits, found four residents of the state of Maryland willing to put their names on a case and sought to have Agnew repay the state $268,482, the amount it was said he had taken in bribes. After two appeals by Agnew, he finally resigned himself to the matter and a check for $268,482 was turned over to Maryland State Treasurer William S. James in early 1983. ...

As a result of his no-contest plea, the state of Maryland later disbarred Agnew, calling him "morally obtuse".[29] As in most jurisdictions, Maryland lawyers are automatically disbarred after being convicted of a felony, and a no-contest plea exposes the defendant to the same penalties as one would face with a guilty plea."


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spiro_Agnew


Why did Montgomery County, MD choose a public-private partnership to build the severely flawed Silver Spring Transit Center? Why wasn't the SSTC bid for construction, as has been standard practice for decades for public works projects? Why didn't Montgomery County use the decades' old, tried-and-true process for selecting professional services firms in selecting the engineer/designer and the concrete inspector/tester for the SSTC? Were political "contributions" part of the selection process? 

Is this Sprio Agnew all over again?




And, what has the news media been reporting on for the past year since the severe flaws in the SSTC were made public? Lately they've been running around measuring snow depths, reporting on whose streets have been plowed and whose haven't and counting potholes. Meanwhile, the hows and the whys of the $120+ million, overdue, overbudget, severely flawed SSTC remain unanswered. 

Nice job, news media!




Bottom line: Buying contracts is wrong. It was wrong in Spiro Agnew's day; and, it's still wrong today. ... So much for public private partnerships.